4.7 Article

Multi-Objective Models for Sparse Optimization in Linear Support Vector Machine Classification

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11173721

Keywords

support vector machine; feature selection; sparse optimization; multi-objective optimization problems; multi-objective machine learning

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the design of linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification techniques as multi-objective optimization problems. The authors focus on applying sparse optimization to feature selection for multi-objective optimization linear SVM. They emphasize the advantages of considering linear SVM classification techniques as multi-objective optimization problems.
The design of linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification techniques is generally a Multi-objective Optimization Problem (MOP). These classification techniques require finding appropriate trade-offs between two objectives, such as the amount of misclassified training data (classification error) and the number of non-zero elements of the separator hyperplane. In this article, we review several linear SVM classification models in the form of multi-objective optimization. We put particular emphasis on applying sparse optimization (in terms of minimization of the number of non-zero elements of the separator hyperplane) to Feature Selection (FS) for multi-objective optimization linear SVM. Our primary purpose is to demonstrate the advantages of considering linear SVM classification techniques as MOPs. In multi-objective cases, we can obtain a set of Pareto optimal solutions instead of one optimal solution in single-objective cases. The results of these linear SVMs are reported on some classification datasets. The test problems are specifically designed to challenge the number of non-zero components of the normal vector of the separator hyperplane. We used these datasets for multi-objective and single-objective models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available