4.6 Article

Identification and recovery of rare earth elements from electronic waste: Material characterization and recovery strategies

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106921

Keywords

E waste; Rare earth materials; Recycling; Sustainability; Characterisation; Materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sustained growth of the electronic and electrical industries emphasizes the importance of efficient energy utilization and recycling of electronic waste. This study aims to identify and explore the recycling possibilities of rare earth materials in electronic waste through material characterization techniques.
The sustained growth of the electronic and electrical industries necessitates not only efficient energy utilization throughout all manufacturing stages but also the recycling of end-of-life electric and electronic components. However, rapid advancements, miniaturization, and added value have led to a significant accumulation of ewaste, posing environmental concerns. Rare Earth Elements (REE) are considered critical raw materials that face a risk of global supply shortage due to their highly desirable performance-enhancing properties such as corrosion resistance. This study focuses on identification and exploring the recycling possibilities of different types of electronic waste for Rare Earth Materials. The electronic waste is first disassembled and categorized, after which material characterization techniques are employed to identify Rare Earth Elements (REEs). X-Ray Diffraction, Xray fluorescence spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy are utilized for this identification. Subsequently, an in-depth review of existing literature is conducted to ascertain the most appropriate method for recovering these REEs. Neodymium and Dysprosium are among the REEs identified in the electronic waste samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available