4.6 Article

Adverse effects of ozonation on the animal welfare of tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in recirculation aquaculture

Journal

AQUACULTURE REPORTS
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2023.101737

Keywords

Ozone; Ozonation; Gill histology; Dna fragmentation; Oxidative stress

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ozone produced oxidants (OPO) are secondary oxidants formed during the disinfection process in recirculating aquaculture systems. This study investigates the impact of OPO on juvenile tilapia and finds that adverse effects are observed at a concentration as low as 0.05 mg/L, with severe impact recorded at 0.1 mg/L chlorine equivalents. Therefore, it is important to keep OPO concentrations below 0.05 mg/L chlorine equivalents to avoid adverse effects on animal welfare.
Ozone is often used to disinfect process water in recirculating aquaculture systems. Here, ozone rapidly leads to the formation of secondary oxidants, called ozone produced oxidants (OPO). We studied the impact of OPO on juvenile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus in brackish water at 0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.15 mg/L chlorine equivalents after 2 d, 9 d and 21 d of exposure, assessing gill histopathology and lesions of the mitochondrial DNA. Damage of the gills was already observed after 2 d, comprising an increased occurrence of lamellar lifting, fusion of the lamellae and edema at 0.15 mg/L. After 21 d, occurrence of lamellar fusion and edema was elevated at 0.15 mg/L. Increased incidence of hyperplasia was already observed at 0.05 mg/L after 9 d. DNA fragmentation increased to 3.92 lesions per 10 kb at 0.15 mg/L compared to 2.62 lesions per 10 kb in the control. In conclusion, first adverse effects were observed at 0.05 mg/L and severe impact is subsequently recorded at 0.1 mg/L chlorine equivalents. Therefore, OPO concentrations need to be kept below 0.05 mg/L chlorine equivalents to avoid adverse effects on animal welfare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available