4.7 Article

Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 1718-1726

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.4406

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research [1U54MH091657]
  2. McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
  3. US National Institutes of Health [K99-R00 MH096801]
  4. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  5. Army Research Laboratory
  6. Army Research Office [W911NF-10-2-0022, W911NF-14-1-0679]
  7. National Institute of Mental Health [2-R01-DC-009209-11]
  8. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [1R01HD086888-01]
  9. Office of Naval Research
  10. National Science Foundation [BCS-1441502, BCS-1430087, PHY-1554488]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resting-state functional connectivity (FC) has helped reveal the intrinsic network organization of the human brain, yet its relevance to cognitive task activations has been unclear. Uncertainty remains despite evidence that resting-state FC patterns are highly similar to cognitive task activation patterns. Identifying the distributed processes that shape localized cognitive task activations may help reveal why resting-state FC is so strongly related to cognitive task activations. We found that estimating task-evoked activity flow (the spread of activation amplitudes) over resting-state FC networks allowed prediction of cognitive task activations in a large-scale neural network model. Applying this insight to empirical functional MRI data, we found that cognitive task activations can be predicted in held-out brain regions (and held-out individuals) via estimated activity flow over resting-state FC networks. This suggests that task-evoked activity flow over intrinsic networks is a large-scale mechanism explaining the relevance of resting-state FC to cognitive task activations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available