4.5 Article

Ethnobotanical Survey on Plants Used to Manage Febrile Illnesses among Herbalists in Casablanca, Morocco

Journal

DIVERSITY-BASEL
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d15070879

Keywords

Casablanca; ethnobotany; fever; herbalist's knowledge; medicinal plants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plants in Morocco have long been recognized as a cultural heritage and medicinal remedy for various ailments. This study collected and documented the knowledge of herbalists in Casablanca regarding the use of plants in traditional medicine to treat fevers. The findings revealed 22 different species of medicinal plants used for this purpose, with Dysphania ambrosioides L. and Citrus x limon (L.) Osbeck being the most frequently recommended.
Plants have been recognized since antiquity in Morocco as a heritage and a remedy for a variety of ailments with a diverse range of pharmacological effects. The current work is ethnomedicinal research conducted to collect herbalists' knowledge about plants utilized in traditional medicine to treat febrile illnesses. In Casablanca, Morocco, 105 herbalists provided information. The data were examined using seven quantitative indices: The Fidelity Level (FL), Use Value (UV), Frequency of Citation (FC), Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), and Informant Consensus Factor (ICF). During the current investigation, twenty-two different species of medicinal plants from eleven families have been reported as being used to treat fevers. The most recommended plant with a high Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC = 0.15) is Dysphania ambrosioides L., which indicates the importance of this species in controlling fever, especially when it is combined with Citrus x limon (L.) Osbeck (RFC = 0.139). Hence, the use of these plants was compared to the literature review. This research contributed to documenting and preserving important Moroccan traditional herbalists' knowledge about plants used to cure febrile illnesses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available