4.4 Article

The Quantum Yang-Mills Theory

Journal

UNIVERSE
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/universe9090423

Keywords

axiomatic field theory; quantum field theory; Yang-Mills; confinement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In axiomatic quantum field theory, the uniqueness of the vacuum is an independent postulate related to the cluster decomposition property. However, this property cannot explain the confinement property of the strong interaction. The previous solution of the Yang-Mills quantum theory introduces an auxiliary field, which leads to the existence of two separate vacua, explaining confinement and the properties of the strong interaction.
In axiomatic quantum field theory, the postulate of the uniqueness of the vacuum (a pure vacuum state) is independent from the other axioms and equivalent to the cluster decomposition property. The latter, however, implies a Coulomb or Yukawa attenuation of the interactions at growing distances and hence cannot accommodate the confining properties of the strong interaction. Thesolution of the Yang-Mills quantum theory given previously uses an auxiliary field to incorporate Gauss's law and demonstrates the existence of two separate vacua, the perturbative and the confining vacuum, therefore resulting in a mixed vacuum state, deriving confinement, as well as the related, expected properties of the strong interaction. The existence of multiple vacua is, in fact, expected by the axiomatic, algebraic quantum field theory, via the decomposition of the vacuum state to eigenspaces of the auxiliary field. The general vacuum state is a mixed quantum state, and the cluster decomposition property does not hold. Because of the energy density difference between the two vacua, the physics of the strong interactions does not admit a Lagrangian description. I clarify the above remarks related to the previous solution of the Yang-Mills interaction and conclude with some discussion a criticism of a related mathematical problem and some tentative comments regarding the spin-2 case.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available