4.7 Article

Elevated temperature performance of cementitious mortars containing pumice, barite, and basalt powder

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107552

Keywords

High temperature; Basalt powder; Barite powder; Pumice; Residual parameters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

"Mortar samples were produced using pumice, barite, and basalt powder as substitutes for cement at ratios of 7.5% and 15%. These samples were exposed to temperatures ranging from 100℃ to 600℃ and were cooled using air and water. The results showed that basalt-containing samples were least affected by high temperatures, while barite-containing samples were most affected. Compressive strength and mass loss varied depending on the cooling method used."
In this study, mortar samples were produced by substituting pumice, barite, and basalt powder instead of cement at 7.5% and 15% ratios. Produced 90-day samples were exposed to tempera-tures of 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 degrees C. After the effect of high temperature, two different cooling processes were applied: air and water. The unit weight, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and compressive strength of the produced samples were measured before the effect of high temper-ature. Compressive strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and mass loss values were also investigated after high temperature. In addition, TGA, XRD and SEM analyses of selected samples were made. The results showed that basalt-containing samples were less affected by the high-temperature effect among the additive-containing samples. In contrast, barite-containing samples were more affected than the other samples. However, it was observed that the compressive strength loss of the air-cooled samples was higher, while the mass loss was higher in the water-cooled samples. In addition, increases in compressive strength and ultrasonic sound transmission values were observed up to a certain temperature value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available