4.6 Article

Augmented Reality-Guided Apicoectomy Based on Maxillofacial CBCT Scans

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 13, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193037

Keywords

apicoectomy; endodontic surgery; root-end resection; surgery; computer-assisted; augmented reality; cone beam computed tomography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the intraoperative feasibility and usability of HoloLens 2, an AR image guidance device, in apicoectomies. The results show that HoloLens has excellent usability and is suitable for apicoectomies.
Implementation of augmented reality (AR) image guidance systems using preoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in apicoectomies promises to help surgeons overcome iatrogenic complications associated with this procedure. This study aims to evaluate the intraoperative feasibility and usability of HoloLens 2, an established AR image guidance device, in the context of apicoectomies. Three experienced surgeons carried out four AR-guided apicoectomies each on human cadaver head specimens. Preparation and operating times of each procedure, as well as the subjective usability of HoloLens for AR image guidance in apicoectomies using the System Usability Scale (SUS), were measured. In total, twelve AR-guided apicoectomies on six human cadaver head specimens were performed (n = 12). The average preparation time amounted to 162 (+/- 34) s. The surgical procedure itself took on average 9 (+/- 2) min. There was no statistically significant difference between the three surgeons. Quantification of the usability of HoloLens revealed a mean SUS score of 80.4 (+/- 6.8), indicating an excellent usability level. In conclusion, this study implies the suitability, practicality, and simplicity of AR image guidance systems such as the HoloLens in apicoectomies and advocates their routine implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available