4.6 Article

Overcoming Underpowering in the Outcome Analysis of Repaired-Tetralogy of Fallot: A Multicenter Database from the CMR/CT Working Group of the Italian Pediatric Cardiology Society (SICPed)

Journal

DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203255

Keywords

tetralogy of Fallot; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; congenital heart disease; Italian registry; repaired tetralogy of Fallot

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study establishes a multicenter clinical database for repaired TOF patients in Italy, aiming to improve clinical/surgical management and risk stratification of this population.
Background: Managing repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) patients is still challenging despite the fact that published studies identified prognostic clinical or imaging data with rather good negative predictive accuracy but weak positive predictive accuracy. Heterogeneity of the initial anatomy, the surgical approach, and the complexity of the mechanism leading to dilation and ventricular dysfunction explain the challenge of predicting the adverse event in this population. Therefore, risk stratification and management of this population remain poorly standardized. Design: The CMR/CT WG of the Italian Pediatric Cardiology Society set up a multicenter observational clinical database of repaired TOF evaluations. This registry will enroll patients retrospectively and prospectively assessed by CMR for clinical indication in many congenital heart diseases (CHD) Italian centers. Data collection in a dedicated platform will include surgical history, clinical data, imaging data, and adverse cardiac events at 6 years of follow-up. Summary: The multicenter repaired TOF clinical database will collect data on patients evaluated by CMR in many CHD centers in Italy. The registry has been set up to allow future research studies in this population to improve clinical/surgical management and risk stratification of this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available