4.6 Article

Role of Oxygen in Amorphous Carbon Hard Mask Plasma Etching

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 8, Issue 36, Pages 32450-32457

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02438

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current and next-generation Si-based semiconductor manufacturing processes, there is a growing interest in using amorphous carbon layer (ACL) hard masks for high-aspect-ratio (HAR) etching. However, the etching characteristics of ACL hard masks under plasma etching conditions have not been extensively studied. This research investigates the role of oxygen in the etching characteristics of ACL hard masks and provides insight into achieving an outstanding etch profile.
In the current and next-generation Si-based semi-conductor manufacturing processes, amorphous carbon layer (ACL) hard masks are garnering considerable attention for high-aspect-ratio (HAR) etching due to their outstanding physical properties. However, a current limitation is the lack of research on the etching characteristics of ACL hard masks under plasma etching conditions. Given the significant impact of hard mask etching on device quality and performance, a deeper understanding of the etching characteristics of ACL is necessary. This study aims to investigate the role of oxygen in the etching characteristics of an ACL hard mask in a complex gas mixture plasma etching process. Our results show that a small change of oxygen concentration (3.5-6.5%) can significantly alter the etch rate and profile of the ACL hard mask. Through our comprehensive plasma diagnostics and wafer-processing results, we have also proven a detailed mechanism for the role of the oxygen gas. This research provides a solution for achieving an outstanding etch profile in ACL hard masks with sub-micron scale and emphasizes the importance of controlling the oxygen concentration to optimize the plasma conditions for the desired etching characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available