4.8 Article

m6A-LAIC-seq reveals the census and complexity of the m6A epitranscriptome

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 692-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3898

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MGH startup
  2. ECOR grants
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01GM088342]
  4. Eli & Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UCLA
  5. Rose Hills Foundation Research Award
  6. Alfred Sloan Research Fellowship
  7. National Research Foundation of Singapore through the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology
  8. National Institute of Environmental Health Science [ES002109, ES024615]
  9. National Science Foundation [CHE-1308839]
  10. NIH [DK090122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-6-Methyladenosine (m(6)A) is a widespread, reversible chemical modification of RNA molecules, implicated in many aspects of RNA metabolism. Little quantitative information exists as to either how many transcript copies of particular genes are m(6)A modified ('m(6)A levels') or the relationship of m(6)A modification(s) to alternative RNA isoforms. To deconvolute the m(6)A epitranscriptome, we developed m(6)A-level and isoform-characterization sequencing (m(6)A-LAIC-seq). We found that cells exhibit a broad range of nonstoichiometric m(6)A levels with cell-type specificity. At the level of isoform characterization, we discovered widespread differences in the use of tandem alternative polyadenylation (APA) sites by methylated and nonmethylated transcript isoforms of individual genes. Strikingly, there is a strong bias for methylated transcripts to be coupled with proximal APA sites, resulting in shortened 3' untranslated regions, while nonmethylated transcript isoforms tend to use distal APA sites. m(6)A-LAIC-seq yields a new perspective on transcriptome complexity and links APA usage to m(6)A modifications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available