4.6 Review

Comprehensive Review of Nutraceuticals against Cognitive Decline Associated with Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 8, Issue 39, Pages 35499-35522

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04855

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, nutraceuticals are widely used for the prevention and treatment of various diseases. They have good bioactivities and can influence multiple cellular processes, which helps improve neurological health and prevent neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. This review summarizes the experimental evidence and mechanisms of action of nutraceuticals in neuroprotection.
Nowadays, nutraceuticals are being incorporated into functional foods or used as supplements with nonpharmacological approaches in the prevention and management of several illnesses, including age-related conditions and chronic neurodegenerative diseases. Nutraceuticals are apt for preventing and treating such disorders because of their nontoxic, non-habit-forming, and efficient bioactivities for promoting neurological well-being due to their ability to influence cellular processes such as neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, synaptic transmission, neuro-inflammation, oxidative stress, cell death modulation, and neuronal survival. The capacity of nutraceuticals to modify all of these processes reveals the potential to develop food-based strategies to aid brain development and enhance brain function, prevent and ameliorate neurodegeneration, and possibly reverse the cognitive impairment observed in Alzheimer's disease, the most predominant form of dementia in the elderly. The current review summarizes the experimental evidence of the neuroprotective capacity of nutraceuticals against Alzheimer's disease, describing their mechanisms of action and the in vitro and in vivo models applied to evaluate their neuroprotective potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available