4.6 Article

Exploring Metal Nanocluster Catalysts for Ammonia Synthesis Using Informatics Methods: A Concerted Effort of Bayesian Optimization, Swarm Intelligence, and First-Principles Computation

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 8, Issue 33, Pages 30335-30348

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c03456

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the use of computational and informatics approaches to design efficient metal nanocluster catalysts for ammonia synthesis. It addresses three main challenges: measuring catalytic activity, selecting the best catalyst from numerous candidates, and identifying the thermodynamically stable cluster catalyst structure. The study employs first-principles calculations, Bayesian optimization, and particle swarm optimization to identify a Ti-8 nanocluster as a potential catalyst candidate. The adsorption structures of N-2 and NH3 on Ti(8) indicate significant activation of N-2 and easy desorption of NH3. The research also discovers cluster catalyst candidates that defy the conventional trade-off between strong adsorption of reactants and products.
This paper details the use of computational and informaticsmethodsto design metal nanocluster catalysts for efficient ammonia synthesis.Three main problems are tackled: defining a measure of catalytic activity,choosing the best candidate from a large number of possibilities,and identifying the thermodynamically stable cluster catalyst structure.First-principles calculations, Bayesian optimization, and particleswarm optimization are used to obtain a Ti-8 nanoclusteras a catalyst candidate. The N-2 adsorption structure onTi(8) indicates substantial activation of the N-2 molecule, while the NH3 adsorption structure suggeststhat NH3 is likely to undergo easy desorption. The studyalso reveals several cluster catalyst candidates that break the generaltrade-off that surfaces that strongly adsorb reactants also stronglyadsorb products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available