4.6 Article

Polymorphs of Substituted p-Toluenesulfonanilide: Synthesis, Single-Crystal Analysis, Hirshfeld Surface Exploration, and Theoretical Investigation

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 8, Issue 38, Pages 35307-35320

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c04957

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This investigation focuses on the two polymorphic forms, triclinic and monoclinic, of ethyl 3-iodo-4-((4-methylphenyl)sulfonamido)benzoate. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis confirms the presence of both polymorphs, and their molecular configurations are stabilized by intramolecular bonding. The crystal packing of the triclinic form is different from the monoclinic form due to different space groups and bonding types. Both compounds exhibit supramolecular assembly through noncovalent or intermolecular interactions, further supported by Hirshfeld surface exploration and density functional theory studies.
Polymorphism is an exciting feature of chemical systems where a compound can exist in different crystal forms. The present investigation is focused on the two polymorphic forms, triclinic (MSBT) and monoclinic (MSBM), of ethyl 3-iodo-4-((4-methylphenyl)sulfonamido)benzoate prepared from ethyl 4-amino-3-iodobenzoate. The prepared polymorphs were unambiguously confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD) analysis. According to the SC-XRD results, the molecular configurations of both structures are stabilized by intramolecular N-H center dot center dot center dot I and C-H center dot center dot center dot O bonding. The crystal packing of MSBT is different as compared to the crystal packing of MSBM because MSBT is crystallized in the triclinic crystal system with the space group P (1) over bar, whereas MSBM is crystallized in the monoclinic crystal system with the space group P2(1)/c. The molecules of MSBT are interlinked in the form of dimers through N-H center dot center dot center dot O bonding to form R-2(2) (8) loops, while the MSBM molecules are connected with each other in the form of an infinite chain through C-H center dot center dot center dot O bonding. The crystal packing of both compounds is further stabilized by off-set pi center dot center dot center dot pi stacking interactions between phenyl rings, which is found stronger in MSBM as compared to in MSBT. Moreover, Hirshfeld surface exploration of the polymorphs was carried out, and the results were compared with the closely related literature structure. Accordingly, the supramolecular assembly of these polymorphs is mainly stabilized by noncovalent interactions or intermolecular interactions. Furthermore, a density functional theory (DFT) study was also carried out, which provided good support for the SC-XRD and Hirshfeld studies, suggesting the formation of both intramolecular and intermolecular interactions for both compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available