4.6 Article

Hydrophobic Barriers for Directing Physarum polycephalum Propulsion and Navigation

Journal

ACS OMEGA
Volume 8, Issue 44, Pages 41649-41654

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05560

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a method to control the movement of P. polycephalum by drawing hydrophobic lines and patterns, demonstrating the effectiveness of hydrophobic barriers in regulating propulsion and navigation. Additionally, it shows that using such geometric constraints can significantly reduce the experimental time required for toxicity testing based on P. polycephalum.
Physarum polycephalum (P. polycephalum) is a unicellular protist with unique properties, such as learning and remembering in its cultured environment without a brain or central nervous system. The organism has been extensively used in morphology, taxis, and positive feedback dynamics studies. However, the lack of standardization of materials and substrate designs used in P. polycephalum studies has significantly limited conducting such studies, increasing the cost and time. In this study, we introduce a method to control the direction and migration of P. polycephalum by drawing hydrophobic lines and patterns. Our study succeeded in controlling the movement of P. polycephalum by setting a variety of hydrophobic designs such as complete barrier, single-slit barrier, taper barrier, dumbbell barrier, and one-side-opened rectangular barrier, suggesting the effectiveness of the hydrophobic barrier in regulating the propulsion and navigation of the organisms. Moreover, we demonstrated that utilizing such geometric constraints can reduce the experimental time required for toxicity testing based on P. polycephalum by more than 300%. Our techniques open new possibilities for studying the biophysical properties and behaviors of P. polycephalum, while also facilitating toxicity testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available