4.5 Article

Endoscopic Endonasal Transplanum-Transtuberculum Approach for Pituitary Adenomas/PitNET: 25 Years of Experience

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13071121

Keywords

pituitary adenoma; PitNET; extended; transplanum; transtuberculum; endoscopic endonasal; outcome; complications

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of the endoscopic transplanum-transtuberculum approach (ETTA) in the treatment of pituitary adenomas/PitNETs (PAs) is feasible but associated with higher morbidity compared to the conventional endoscopic approach.
The role of the endoscopic transplanum-transtuberculum approach (ETTA) in the treatment of pituitary adenomas/PitNETs (PAs) is sparsely analyzed in the literature, and its use is still debated in the current practice. The aim of this study was to report our experience with this approach. Our institutional registry was retrospectively reviewed, and patients who underwent ETTA for a PA from 1998 to 2022 were included. Fifty-seven cases were enrolled over a time span of 25 years, corresponding to 2.4% of our entire PA caseload. Radical resection was achieved in 57.9% of cases, with re-do surgery (p = 0.033) and vessel encasement/engulfment (p < 0.001) as predictors of partial resection. CSF leak incidence stood at 8.8%, with higher BMI (p = 0.038) as its only significant predictor. Partial or full improvement of the visual field deficits was achieved in 73.5% of cases. No surgical mortality was observed. According to our results, ETTA for the treatment of PAs is characterized by a satisfactory surgical outcome but with greater morbidity than the conventional endoscopic approach. Therefore, it should be reserved for the few selected cases otherwise unsuitable for the endoscopic trans-sphenoidal route, representing a valid alternative and an effective complementary route for the transcranial approach for these challenging PAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available