4.7 Article

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Five Foodborne Viruses in Shellfish Based on Multiplex qPCR

Journal

FOODS
Volume 12, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12183462

Keywords

risk assessment; foodborne virus; multiplex PCR; shellfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foodborne diseases are a critical food safety issue globally, with shellfish carrying various foodborne viruses posing a risk of infection. Factors such as age, season, and type of shellfish are associated with different levels of infection risk.
Foodborne diseases are currently the most critical food safety issue in the world. There are not many hazard identification and exposure assessments for foodborne viruses (Norovirus GI, GII, Hepatitis A Virus, Rotavirus, Adenovirus) in shellfish. Multiplex qPCR for the simultaneous detection of five foodborne viruses was established and used to assess infection risk based on a 1-year pathogenesis study. The sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the multiplex qPCR method are consistent with that of conventional qPCR, which saves more time and effort. Overall, 37.86% of shellfish samples had one or more foodborne viruses. Risk assessment formulae and matrices were used to develop risk assessments for different age groups, different seasons and different shellfish. The annual probability of contracting a foodborne virus infection from shellfish is greater than 1.6 x 10-1 for all populations, and even for infants aged 0-4 years, it is greater than 1.5 x 10-2, which is much higher than the risk thresholds recommended by WHO (10-6) and the US EPA (10-4). High risk (level IV) is associated with springtime, and medium risk (level III) is associated with Mussel consumption. This study provides a basis for the risk of foodborne viral infections in people of different ages, in different seasons, and by consuming different shellfish.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available