4.7 Article

Quality Characteristics of Fresh Date Palm Fruits of Medjoul and Confitera cv. from the Southeast of Spain (Elche Palm Grove)

Journal

FOODS
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12142659

Keywords

date fruit; Confitera; Medjoul; food quality; polyphenol composition; antioxidant properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the quality characteristics of date fruits of two cultivars (Confitera and Medjoul) grown in the Elche palm grove in Southeast Spain, in order to select the most profitable cultivar for fresh date production in Elche.
The quality characteristics (physical, techno-functional, and chemical) of date fruits (at the tamar stage) of two cultivars (Confitera, autochthonous and unknown vs. Medjoul, widely distributed and well-known), grown in the Southeast of Spain (Elche palm grove) were evaluated in order to reinforce decisions aimed at organizing the production of fresh dates from Elche by selecting the most profitable cultivar. Morphologically, Confitera dates were longer and with higher pulp yield than Medjoul dates (4.58 cm vs. 3.88 cm, and 84% vs. 78%, respectively) (p < 0.05). Nutritionally, both dates are a good source of carbohydrates (total sugars (43-48%) and dietary fiber (20-22%)), with small amounts of fat and proteins. The main free sugars in dates from both cultivars were glucose and fructose (reducing sugars). The most abundant mineral found in both date fruits were K, followed by Ca or Mg (depending on the cultivar; Ca in Medjoul and Mg in Confitera). Confitera dates showed a higher total antioxidant activity than Medjoul, corresponding with their higher (p < 0.05) content in polyphenolic compounds, mainly flavonoids (catechin and epicatechin predominantly). Confitera dates should be promoted in this region not only for their contribution to sustainable agricultural development and biodiversity, but also for their higher overall quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available