4.7 Article

Occurrence and Dietary Exposure to Acrylamide from Foods Consumed within and outside Main Meals in Singapore

Journal

FOODS
Volume 12, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12163022

Keywords

acrylamide; foods; snack; LC-MS/MS; dietary exposure; risk assessment; MOE; Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impact of 'snackification' on Singaporean diets and the resulting increase in acrylamide exposure. Acrylamide levels in commonly consumed foods were measured using LC-MS/MS. High concentrations of acrylamide were found in vegetables cooked at high temperatures and potato-based crackers and chips. The estimated dietary exposure for Singapore's population exceeded the safe threshold, indicating a potential health concern. These findings emphasize the need for industry practices and consumer advisories to reduce acrylamide exposure from all types of food.
This study investigated the influence of 'snackification' in Singaporean diets, leading to increased dietary acrylamide exposure. Acrylamide concentrations in commonly consumed foods within and outside the main meals were measured using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). High acrylamide concentrations were detected in vegetables cooked at high temperatures (ranging from 0.5 to 478.4 mu g/kg) and potato-based crackers and chips (ranging from 81.8 to 2095.8 mu g/kg). The estimated total dietary exposure for the Singapore population was 0.165 mu g/kg bw/day for general consumers and 0.392 mu g/kg bw/day for high consumers (95th percentile). The acrylamide exposure from outside main meals was nearly equivalent to that from within the main meals. The calculated margins of exposure (MOE) were below 10,000, indicating potential human health concern. These findings highlight the need for industry practices and consumer advisories to reduce acrylamide exposure from foods consumed both within and outside main meals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available