4.7 Article

Food Safety Knowledge among Professional Food Handlers in Slovenia: The Results of a Nation-Wide Survey

Journal

FOODS
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods12142735

Keywords

food safety; food handler; knowledge; hygiene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors present and discuss the results of a nation-wide survey on food safety knowledge among professional food handlers in Slovenia. The survey revealed gaps in food safety knowledge, particularly regarding temperature. There is a need for improvement in the current system of food safety training courses for professional food handlers in Slovenia.
The authors present and discuss the results of a nation-wide survey on food safety knowledge among professional food handlers in Slovenia. The data were collected via a telephone survey using a well-established questionnaire adapted to the Slovenian context. Altogether, 601 respondents from hotels, restaurants, catering, and confectionery units completed the questionnaire. To assess food safety knowledge among food handlers in both general and specific domains, three indexes (a General Knowledge Index, a Personal Knowledge Index, and a Temperature Knowledge Index) were created. Among them, the Temperature Knowledge Index revealed the largest gaps in knowledge. An insufficient transfer of food safety knowledge from managers and chefs to assistant chefs and kitchen assistants in establishments where more persons handle food was evident, while a course titled Hygiene Minimum of standardised training from the past still significantly contributes to food safety knowledge. The results suggest a need for improvement in the current system of food safety training courses for professional food handlers in Slovenia. The human factor in the food supply chain still has a significant role in ensuring food safety culture, and therefore must become a more important part of the food safety management system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available