4.7 Article

Subantarctic pCO(2) estimated from a biogeochemical float: comparison with moored observations reinforces the importance of spatial and temporal variability

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1231953

Keywords

CO2 partial pressure; BGC Argo float; mooring; Southern Ocean; carbon flux; absolute accuracy estimate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the size and future changes of natural ocean carbon sinks is critical for the projection of atmospheric CO2 levels. The mechanism behind the variability of the Southern Ocean carbon flux is still debated and accurate observations are limited. This study evaluated the accuracy of CO2 partial pressure estimates from biogeochemical floats in the Southern Ocean using data collected over a year. The results showed that the differences in pCO(2) estimates between platforms were within tolerable uncertainties, highlighting the importance of continued validation efforts.
Understanding the size and future changes of natural ocean carbon sinks is critical for the projection of atmospheric CO2 levels. The magnitude of the Southern Ocean carbon flux has varied significantly over past decades but mechanisms behind this variability are still under debate. While high accuracy observations, e.g. from ships and moored platforms, are important to improve models they are limited through space and time. Observations from autonomous platforms with emerging biogeochemical capabilities, e.g. profiling floats, provide greater spatial and temporal coverage. However, the absolute accuracy of CO2 partial pressure (pCO(2)) derived from float pH sensors is not well constrained. Here we capitalize on data collected for over a year by a biogeochemical Argo float near the Southern Ocean Time Series observatory to evaluate the accuracy of pCO(2) estimates from floats beyond the initial in water comparisons at deployment. A latitudinal gradient of increasing pCO(2) southward and spatial variability contributed to observed discrepancies. Comparisons between float estimated pCO(2) and mooring observations were therefore restricted by temperature and potential density criteria (similar to 7 & mu;atm difference) and distance (1 degrees C latitude and longitude, similar to 11 mu mdifference). By utilizing high quality moored and shipboard underway pCO(2) observations, and estimates from CTD casts, we therefore found that over a year, differences in pCO(2) between platforms were within tolerable uncertainties. Continued validation efforts, using measurements with known and sufficient accuracy, are vital in the continued assessment of float-based pCO(2) estimates, especially in a highly dynamic region such as the subantarctic zone of the Southern Ocean.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available