4.8 Article

Mechanism of hard-nanomaterial clearance by the liver

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 1212-1221

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4718

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  3. Collaborative Health Research Program
  4. NSERC Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship Program
  5. Surgeon-Scientist Program at the University of Toronto
  6. CASL/CIHR Hepatology Fellowship Program
  7. National CIHR Research Training Program in Hepatitis C
  8. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  9. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1463492] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The liver and spleen are major biological barriers to translating nanomedicines because they sequester the majority of administered nanomaterials and prevent delivery to diseased tissue. Here we examined the blood clearance mechanism of administered hard nanomaterials in relation to blood flow dynamics, organ microarchitecture and cellular phenotype. We found that nanomaterial velocity reduces 1,000-fold as they enter and traverse the liver, leading to 7.5 times more nanomaterial interaction with hepatic cells relative to peripheral cells. In the liver, Kupffer cells (84.8 +/- 6.4%), hepatic B cells (81.5 +/- 9.3%) and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (64.6 +/- 13.7%) interacted with administered PEGylated quantum dots, but splenic macrophages took up less material (25.4 +/- 10.1%) due to differences in phenotype. The uptake patterns were similar for two other nanomaterial types and five different surface chemistries. Potential new strategies to overcome off-target nanomaterial accumulation may involve manipulating intra-organ flow dynamics and modulating the cellular phenotype to alter hepatic cell interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available