4.7 Article

Unraveling the genomic diversity and ecological potential of the genus Demequina: insights from comparative analysis of different saline niche strains

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1244849

Keywords

Demequina; comparative genomic analysis; diversity and identification; tidal flat; saline lake

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During an investigation of microbial diversity in sediments, seven strains of Demequina were found. These strains have the potential to degrade complex carbon sources and oxidize sulfides, and provide insights into their metabolic model and ecological roles.
During an investigation of the culturable microbial diversity of sediments with salinity from tidal flats and saline lake, seven strains of the genus Demequina were harvested. The genomic analysis and physiological characteristics of strains of this genus have unveiled their significant potential in degrading complex carbon source such as lignin, hemicellulose, chitin, and oligosaccharides. In addition, these strains show potential abilities in nitrite ammonification and sulfide oxidation. These findings not only improved our understanding of their metabolic model, but also provided valuable insights into their ecological roles. Four new species of the genus Demequina are described: Demequina litoralis sp. nov., with SYSU T00192(T) designated as the type species; Demequina zhanjiangensis sp. nov., with SYSU T00b26(T) as the type species; Demequina lignilytica sp. nov., with SYSU T00068(T) as the type species; and Demequina muriae sp. nov., with EGI L300058(T) as the type species. Additionally, strains SYSU T0a273, SYSU T00039-1, and SYSU T00039 are identified as different strains of Demequina lignilytica. Our study thus sheds light on the diversity, biological significance, and ecological contribution of the Demequina genus in different habitats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available