4.7 Article

Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24: A root beneficial bacterium with an excellent ability to remove multiple nitrogen sources

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104138

Keywords

Biological nitrogen removal; Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification; Mixed inorganic nitrogen sources; Nitrite accumulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The root-associated beneficial bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24 showed a high capacity for nitrogen removal in synthetic and actual wastewater. It efficiently removed ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite, with removal rates exceeding 98%. The strain also performed well in actual wastewater, removing a significant percentage of ammonium and nitrate. Overall, the findings suggest that strain 2P24 has potential applications for biological wastewater treatment.
The nitrogen removal capacity of the root-associated beneficial bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24 was investigated in synthetic wastewater and actual wastewater. The results revealed that strain 2P24 removed 97.63 % of ammonium and 100 % of nitrate and nitrite within 48 h when ammonium, nitrate, or nitrite served as the sole nitrogen source (initial concentrations of 100 mg/L). At an ammonium to nitrate to nitrite ratio of 1:1:1, ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite were all removed with efficiencies exceeding 98 %. In addition, strain 2P24 exhibited high nitrogen removal performance in actual wastewater, removing 79.52 % of ammonium and 100 % of nitrate from unsterilized domestic sewage in 10 h. Moreover, regardless of whether the strain was grown in the presence of a sole nitrogen source or mixed nitrogen sources, there was no hazardous nitrite accumulation after 48 h of cultivation. Collectively, the findings indicated that strain 2P24 has potential applications as a standby bacterium for the biological treatment of wastewater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available