4.7 Article

Elimination of sulfamethoxazole by anodic oxidation using mixed metal oxide anodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103922

Keywords

Sulfamethoxazole; Anodic oxidation; Ru; Ir ratios; Electrodes; Solar energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The degradation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) was studied using anodic oxidation (AO) with mixed metal oxide (MMO) electrodes with different Ru/Ir ratios. The electrode with the highest Ir composition showed the best degradation efficiency and was used to treat the antibiotic in natural water and wastewater effluents. The use of solar-assisted AO reduced electrolysis times and energy consumption.
The degradation of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) was studied by anodic oxidation (AO) process using mixed metal oxide (MMO) electrodes with different Ru/Ir ratios. Each electrode was characterized morphological and electrochemically. The electrolyzes were performed in NaCl and Na2SO4 applying two current densities (10 and 50 mA cm-2). The electrode with the highest composition of Ir, Ru/Ir (30/70), showed greater SMX degradation and generation of oxidizing species and was used to treat the antibiotic by AO and AO assisted by solar energy in natural water and actual municipal wastewater effluents.The efficiency in SMX degradation depends on the type of electrode used (MMO) and electrolytic medium. All MMO electrodes, reached almost total degradation of SMX in chloride medium. However, 60 % degradation of SMX in sulfate medium was achieved with anode with lower Ru/Ir ratio. Additionally, degradation of SMX in complex matrices can be successfully carried out by solar-assisted AO and AO processes, without the need to adjust the pH, at room temperature and using anode with lower Ru/Ir ratio. Finally, the AO process assisted by solar energy reduced electrolysis times and the cell's potential, leading to lower energy consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available