4.7 Article

Investigation of optimization methods for metal foam with two-dimensional porosity gradient in shell-and-tube latent heat storage

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107004

Keywords

Latent heat storage; Porosity gradient; Metal foam; Numerical simulation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of metal foam strengthened latent heat thermal energy storage (LTES) can promote the development of renewable energy and waste heat recovery. This study establishes the superposition method and 2D iterative method to optimize the 2D porosity gradient of metal foam infiltrated in phase change material (PCM) for enhanced heat transfer in LTES. The numerical investigation shows that the optimal case obtained by the 2D iterative method has the best heat transfer performance among different methods.
The latent heat thermal energy storage (LTES) strengthened by metal foam can promote the development of renewable energy and waste heat recovery. In this study, superposition method and 2D iterative method are established to optimize the 2D porosity gradient of metal foam, which is infiltrated in phase change material (PCM) for heat transfer enhancement in LTES with shell-and-tube configuration. The optimization process in these new methods takes the interaction between horizontal and vertical porosity gradient into account and the evolution of two-dimensional metal foam porosity is numerically investigated. Melting behaviors of optimal cases with different methods are compared and analyzed. The numerical results demonstrated that the optimal case obtained by 2D iterative method has best heat transfer performance. Compared with the uniform distribution, a 11.32 % reduction in full melting time can be achieved by the 2D iterative optimal case due to its better temperature uniformity and stronger natural convection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available