4.8 Article

Carbon and sulfur budget of the silicate Earth explained by accretion of differentiated planetary embryos

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 781-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX13AM51G]
  2. NSF [EAR-1053816]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences [1258876] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. NASA [469226, NNX13AM51G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The abundances of volatile elements in the Earth's mantle have been attributed to the delivery of volatile-rich material after the main phase of accretion(1-3). However, no known meteorites could deliver the volatile elements, such as carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen and sulfur, at the relative abundances observed for the silicate Earth(4). Alternatively, Earth could have acquired its volatile inventory during accretion and differentiation, but the fate of volatile elements during core formation is known only for a limited set of conditions(4-8). Here we present constraints from laboratory experiments on the partitioning of carbon and sulfur between metallic cores and silicate mantles under conditions relevant for rocky planetary bodies. We find that carbon remains more siderophile than sulfur over a range of oxygen fugacities; however, our experiments suggest that in reduced or sulfur-rich bodies, carbon is expelled from the segregating core. Combined with previous constraints(9), we propose that the ratio of carbon to sulfur in the silicate Earth could have been established by differentiation of a planetary embryo that was then accreted to the proto-Earth. We suggest that the accretion of a Mercury-like (reduced) or a sulfur-rich (oxidized) differentiated body-in which carbon has been preferentially partitioned into the mantle-may explain the Earth's carbon and sulfur budgets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available