4.8 Article

Sequestration of carbon in the deep Atlantic during the last glaciation

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 319-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2657

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ARC [DP140101393, FT140100993]
  2. International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams
  3. DECRA [DE150100107]
  4. NERC [NE/J008133/1]
  5. Australian Laureate Fellowship [FL120100050]
  6. Australian Research Council [FT140100993] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J008133/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. NERC [NE/J008133/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Atmospheric CO2 concentrations declined markedly about 70,000 years ago, when the Earth's climate descended into the last glaciation. Much of the carbon removed from the atmosphere has been suspected to have entered the deep oceans, but evidence for increased carbon storage remains elusive. Here we use the B/Ca ratios of benthic foraminifera from several sites across the Atlantic Ocean to reconstruct changes in the carbonate ion concentration and hence the carbon inventory of the deep Atlantic across this transition. We find that deep Atlantic carbonate ion concentration declined by around 25 mu mol kg(-1) between similar to 80,000 and 65,000 years ago. This drop implies that the deep Atlantic carbon inventory increased by at least 50 Gt around the same time as the amount of atmospheric carbon dropped by about 60 Gt. From a comparison with proxy records of deep circulation and climate model simulations, we infer that the carbon sequestration coincided with a shoaling of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. We thus conclude that changes in the Atlantic Ocean circulation may have played an important role in reductions of atmospheric CO2 concentrations during the last glaciation, by increasing the carbon storage in the deep Atlantic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available