4.8 Article

Prospective functional classification of all possible missense variants in PPARG

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 1570-1575

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3700

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [1K08DK102877-01, 1R01DK097768-01]
  2. NIH/Harvard Catalyst [1KL2TR001100-01]
  3. Broad Institute
  4. Wellcome Trust [095564, 107064]
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12012/5/B, MC_UU_12012/5] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10176, CL-2013-23-001, NF-SI-0507-10380, NF-SI-0513-10109] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Wellcome Trust [110082/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MC_UU_12012/5] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical exome sequencing routinely identifies missense variants in disease-related genes, but functional characterization is rarely undertaken, leading to diagnostic uncertainty(1,2). For example, mutations in PPARG cause Mendelian lipodystrophy(3,4) and increase risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D)(5). Although approximately 1 in 500 people harbor missense variants in PPARG, most are of unknown consequence. To prospectively characterize PPAR gamma variants, we used highly parallel oligonucleotide synthesis to construct a library encoding all 9,595 possible single-amino acid substitutions. We developed a pooled functional assay in human macrophages, experimentally evaluated all protein variants, and used the experimental data to train a variant classifier by supervised machine learning. When applied to 55 new missense variants identified in population-based and clinical sequencing, the classifier annotated 6 variants as pathogenic; these were subsequently validated by single variant assays. Saturation mutagenesis and prospective experimental characterization can support immediate diagnostic interpretation of newly discovered missense variants in disease-related genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available