4.7 Article

ROS-Mediated Fragmentation Alters the Effects of Hyaluronan on Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom13091385

Keywords

high-molecular-weight hyaluronan; low-molecular-weight hyaluronan; oxidative stress; wound healing; corneal epithelium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can cause fragmentation of hyaluronan (HA), altering its physiological activity. The chemical structures and physiological properties of oxidized HA products (oxHA) vary depending on the oxidizing agent.
A buildup of reactive oxygen species (ROS) occurs in virtually all pathological conditions. Hyaluronan (HA) is a major extracellular matrix component and is susceptible to oxidation by reactive oxygen species (ROS), yet the precise chemical structures of oxidized HA products (oxHA) and their physiological properties remain largely unknown. This study characterized the molecular weight (MW), structures, and physiological properties of oxHA. For this, high-molecular-weight HA (HMWHA) was oxidized using increasing molar ratios of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or hypochlorous acid (HOCl). ROS lead to the fragmentation of HA, with the oxHA products produced by HOCl exhibiting an altered chemical structure while those produced by H2O2 do not. HMWHA promotes the viability of human corneal epithelial cells (hTCEpi), while low MWHA (LMWHA), ultra-LMWHA (ULMWHA), and most forms of oxHA do not. HMWHA and LMWHA promote hTCEpi proliferation, while ULMWHA and all forms of oxHA do not. LMWHA and some forms of oxHA promote hTCEpi migration, while HMWHA does not. Finally, all native forms of HA and oxHA produced by HOCl promote in vivo corneal wound healing, while oxHA produced by H2O2 does not. Taken together, our results show that HA fragmentation by ROS can alter the physiological activity of HA by altering its MW and structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available