4.7 Review

Should Cystatin C eGFR Become Routine Clinical Practice?

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom13071075

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; cardiovascular disease; cystatin C; GFR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessing kidney function is vital for diagnosing and managing kidney diseases. The widely used indicator, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), has challenges in direct measurement. Serum creatinine, a commonly used marker, has limitations in accuracy. Cystatin C, unaffected by muscle mass, shows stronger associations with cardiovascular disease and mortality. Equations have been developed combining creatinine and cystatin C to estimate GFR, improving accuracy. Cystatin C-based estimates outperform creatinine-based estimates in predicting outcomes, especially in elderly and non-white ethnic groups, aiding in early detection of kidney disease and guiding decision-making.
Kidney function assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing kidney diseases. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is widely used as an indicator of kidney function, but its direct measurement is challenging. Serum creatinine, a commonly used marker for estimating GFR (eGFR), has limitations in accuracy and sensitivity. Cystatin C, a protein freely filtered by the glomerulus, has emerged as a promising alternative marker for kidney function. It is unaffected by muscle mass and shows stronger associations with cardiovascular disease and mortality than creatinine. Various equations have been developed to estimate GFR using creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination. The CKD-EPIcreat-cys equation combining both markers demonstrates improved accuracy in GFR estimation, especially for individuals with eGFR values of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Cystatin C-based estimates of GFR outperform creatinine-based estimates in predicting clinical outcomes and identifying patients at higher risk, particularly in elderly and non-white ethnic groups. Cystatin C offers advantages over creatinine as a marker of kidney function. It is not influenced by non-kidney factors and provides more accurate estimation of GFR, aiding in the early detection of kidney disease and predicting adverse outcomes. Incorporating cystatin C into routine kidney function assessment may improve patient risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making. However, widespread adoption of cystatin C testing requires increased availability and accessibility in clinical laboratories. Further research and implementation efforts are needed to fully realize the potential of cystatin C in kidney function assessment and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available