Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening
Daniel B. Larremore et al.
SCIENCE ADVANCES (2021)
'Test, re-test, re-test': using inaccurate tests to greatly increase the accuracy of COVID-19 testing
Kamalini Ramdas et al.
NATURE MEDICINE (2020)
Bayesian analysis of tests with unknown specificity and sensitivity
Andrew Gelman et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS (2020)
2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors
Rebecca B. Perkins et al.
JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE (2020)
Bias due to differential and non-differential disease- and exposure misclassification in studies of vaccine effectiveness
Tom De Smedt et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
Rotavirus, vaccine failure or diagnostic error?
Monica Lopez-Lacort et al.
VACCINE (2016)
The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S® and XS® INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring
F. Ryan et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY (2010)
How far from non-differential does exposure or disease misclassification have to be to bias measures of association away from the null?
Anne M. Jurek et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
The effect of misclassification on evaluating the effectiveness of influenza vaccines
Kotaro Ozasa
VACCINE (2008)
Share Paper
