4.8 Article

Multistep nucleation of nanocrystals in aqueous solution

Journal

NATURE CHEMISTRY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 77-82

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.2618

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation's Competitive Research Program [NRF-CRP9-2011-04]
  2. National University of Singapore [NUSYIA-FY14-P17, 154-000-606-112]
  3. Microbiology Institute (Singapore)
  4. Centre for Bioimaging Sciences
  5. Lee Kuan Yew Endowment Fund
  6. National Science Foundation Division of Materials Research [1309765]
  7. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Funding Grant [53062-ND6]
  8. [NRF-CRP8-2011-07]
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Materials Research [1309765] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nucleation and growth of solids from solutions impacts many natural processes and is fundamental to applications in materials engineering and medicine. For a crystalline solid, the nucleus is a nanoscale cluster of ordered atoms that forms through mechanisms still poorly understood. In particular, it is unclear whether a nucleus forms spontaneously from solution via a single-or multiple-step process. Here, using in situ electron microscopy, we show how gold and silver nanocrystals nucleate from supersaturated aqueous solutions in three distinct steps: spinodal decomposition into solute-rich and solute-poor liquid phases, nucleation of amorphous nanoclusters within the metal-rich liquid phase, followed by crystallization of these amorphous clusters. Our ab initio calculations on gold nucleation suggest that these steps might be associated with strong gold-gold atom coupling and water-mediated metastable gold complexes. The understanding of intermediate steps in nuclei formation has important implications for the formation and growth of both crystalline and amorphous materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available