4.7 Article

Transcriptome analyses reveal new insights on key determinants of perineural invasion in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1109710

Keywords

ovarian cancer; neural invasion; TAS2R receptor family proteins; tumor immune microenvironment; transcriptome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perineural invasion (PNI) is found to be a significant independent prognostic factor in ovarian cancer (OC) patients, with shorter overall survival (OS) time. PNI positivity is negatively correlated with immune killer cell infiltration in OC tumor tissues. TAS2R proteins are upregulated in PNI-positive OC tissues and predict poor prognoses.
Perineural invasion (PNI) is a pathological feature of many cancers associated with poor outcomes, metastases, and recurrence. In relation to ovarian cancer (OC), there is no information about PNI's role and mechanisms. Our study found that patients with PNI-positive symptoms had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) time than patients with PNI-negative symptoms. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that PNI represented a substantial independent prognostic factor in OC patients. At the transcriptome level, it is noteworthy that PNI positivity was negatively correlated with the degree of infiltration of immune killer cells in OC tumor tissues, including macrophage, central memory CD4 T-cell, natural killer cells, monocyte, and central memory CD4 T-cell. The results of this study revealed that TAS2Rs proteins were markedly upregulated in PNI-positive OC tissues and predicted poor prognoses. Moreover, Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that the TAS2R10 protein was associated with poor prognoses and PNI in OC. Consequently, we found for the first time that PNI was a powerful predictor of poor prognosis in OC and analyzed its expression pattern and some preliminary biochemical characterization, providing new clues for guiding clinical prevention and treatment of OC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available