4.8 Article

Reticular synthesis of porous molecular 1D nanotubes and 3D networks

Journal

NATURE CHEMISTRY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 17-25

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.2663

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/H000925/1, EP/N004884/1, EP/K018132/1]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union/ERC [307358, 321156]
  3. Royal Society
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. EPSRC [EP/L000202]
  6. EPSRC [EP/N004884/1, EP/H000925/1, EP/L000202/1, EP/K018132/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H000925/1, EP/N004884/1, EP/K018132/1, EP/L000202/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic control over pore size and pore connectivity is the crowning achievement for porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). The same level of control has not been achieved for molecular crystals, which are not defined by strong, directional intermolecular coordination bonds. Hence, molecular crystallization is inherently less controllable than framework crystallization, and there are fewer examples of 'reticular synthesis', in which multiple building blocks can be assembled according to a common assembly motif. Here we apply a chiral recognition strategy to a new family of tubular covalent cages to create both 1D porous nanotubes and 3D diamondoid pillared porous networks. The diamondoid networks are analogous to MOFs prepared from tetrahedral metal nodes and linear ditopic organic linkers. The crystal structures can be rationalized by computational lattice-energy searches, which provide an in silico screening method to evaluate candidate molecular building blocks. These results are a blueprint for applying the 'node and strut' principles of reticular synthesis to molecular crystals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available