4.7 Article

Exposure to lung-migrating helminth protects against murine SARS-CoV-2 infection through macrophage-dependent T cell activation

Journal

SCIENCE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 86, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.adf8161

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regions with endemic helminth infections have lower COVID-19 severity and mortality. Research shows that lung remodeling caused by previous infection with a lung-migrating helminth, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, enhances viral clearance and survival in mice infected with SARS-CoV-2. This protection is linked to increased accumulation of specific CD8(+) T cells and is dependent on the presence of macrophages with a type 2 transcriptional and epigenetic signature.
Helminth endemic regions report lower COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Here, we show that lung remodeling from a prior infection with a lung-migrating helminth, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, enhances viral clearance and survival of human-ACE2 transgenic mice challenged with SARS-CoV-2 (SCV2). This protection is associated with a lymphocytic infiltrate, including increased accumulation of pulmonary SCV2-specific CD8(+) T cells, and anti-CD8 antibody depletion abrogated the N. brasiliensis-mediated reduction in viral loads. Pulmonary macrophages with a type 2 transcriptional and epigenetic signature persist in the lungs of N. brasiliensis-exposed mice after clearance of the parasite and establish a primed environment for increased CD8(+) T cell recruitment and activation. Accordingly, depletion of macrophages ablated the augmented viral clearance and accumulation of CD8(+) T cells driven by prior N. brasiliensis infection. Together, these findings support the concept that lung-migrating helminths can limit disease severity during SCV2 infection through macrophage-dependent enhancement of antiviral CD8(+) T cell responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available