4.5 Review

Molecular pyramids - from tetrahedranes to [6]pyramidanes

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41570-023-00525-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of 3D architectures at a molecular scale, specifically molecular pyramids with all-carbon frameworks and various geometries, has been a fascinating subject for chemists. While some substituted forms of tetrahedranes and all-carbon [4]-[5]pyramidanes have been experimentally generated and explored, the hypothetical unsubstituted parent [3]-[6]pyramidanes have primarily been studied computationally. However, the replacement of carbon vertices with isolobal main group element fragments has resulted in stable hetero[m]pyramidanes that have been successfully synthesized and characterized.
The study of 3D architectures at a molecular scale has fascinated chemists for generations. This includes molecular pyramids with all-carbon frameworks, such as trigonal, tetragonal and pentagonal pyramidal geometries. A small number of substituted tetrahedranes and all-carbon [4]-[5]pyramidanes have been experimentally generated and studied. Although the hypothetical unsubstituted parent [3]-[6]pyramidanes have only been explored computationally, the formal replacement of carbon vertices with isolobal main group element fragments has provided a number of examples of stable hetero[m]pyramidanes, which have been isolated and amply characterized. In this Review, we highlight the synthesis and chemical properties of [3]-[6]pyramidanes and summarize the progress in the development of chemistry of pyramid-shaped molecules. Pyramidanes are curious molecules. The tetrahedranes and the [4]-[6]pyramidanes exhibit molecular structures derived from trigonal to hexagonal pyramids. Examples of these pyramidanes are presented and their structural, spectroscopic and chemical features are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available