4.7 Article

Micronutrient Fertiliser Reinforcement by Fulvate-Lignosulfonate Coating Improves Physiological Responses in Tomato

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13082013

Keywords

chelate fertiliser; humic acid; lignosulfonate; natural polymers; micronutrient uptake; Solanum lycopersicum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the responses of tomato plants to two different micronutrient formulations, demonstrating that a newly developed fulvate-lignosulfonate coating significantly improves growth and physiological parameters. The new coated formulation also increases the availability of micronutrients and leads to higher yields in tomato plants.
Micronutrients are essential to plants, and enhancing their availability is one of the agronomic challenges to improving crop quality and yield. This study, under controlled greenhouse conditions, compares tomato plants' responses to two different micronutrient EDTA-chelated formulations, one of them including a newly developed fulvate-lignosulfonate coating. Growth, yield, and several physiological parameters, including photosynthetic gas exchange, water-use efficiency, leaf nutrient content, leaf greenness and the effective quantum yield of photosystem II, were measured to compare their efficiency. The results showed that the new coated formulation significantly improved growth and most of the determined physiological parameters. At the end of the experiment, higher foliar levels of Fe (2.4-fold) and Mn (2.9-fold) were measured, revealing increased availability of lignofulfonate-complexed micronutrients compared to the traditional fertiliser. Moreover, the photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance were 9- and 20-fold higher, respectively, than when using the standard fertiliser. In conclusion, the new coated fulvate-lignosulfonated fertiliser provided a more suitable source of micronutrients for tomato plant fertilisation, allowing for higher yields, which correlated with a generally improved physiological response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available