4.7 Article

Compost Tea as Organic Fertilizer and Plant Disease Control: Bibliometric Analysis

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13092340

Keywords

biological control; biostimulant; organic agriculture; phytopathogens

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compost tea has been found to control plant pathogens and promote plant growth, leading to reduced reliance on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. This study characterized and quantified the scientific production on compost tea using bibliometric indicators, showing an increasing trend in research output over time.
A variety of research reports that compost tea controls plant pathogens and improves plant nutrition and plant growth. Therefore, it can be used to reduce the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. The aim of the study was to characterize and quantify the scientific production in the SCOPUS database on compost tea using bibliometric indicators. A total of 285 published papers related to compost tea were identified. The results show a general increasing trend from 2001 to 2023, with the highest number of publications occurring in 2021. Most of the publications were in the form of original articles, and English was the main language of publication. The top 10 countries with the highest scientific productivity were the United States, Egypt, Spain, Canada, Italy, India, China, Australia, Iran and Malaysia. Zaccardelli, M. and Pane, C. were the authors with the highest productivity with nine articles. In the co-authorship networks, two main networks were registered: the first with Dianez F., together with Gea F. J., Navarro M.Y. and Santo M., and the second with Zaccardelli M., Celono G., and Pane C. Therefore, the need to adapt more resilient agricultural production systems allows for the consideration of compost tea as an alternative to mitigate environmental problems and soil degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available