4.7 Article

Identification of Individual Hanwoo Cattle by Muzzle Pattern Images through Deep Learning

Journal

ANIMALS
Volume 13, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13182856

Keywords

cattle identification; deep learning; transfer learning; Efficientnet; Hanwoo; muzzle pattern

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully identified Hanwoo cattle using a deep-learning model and muzzle images. By taking images of the same individuals at different times, overfitting models were avoided. Among multiple transfer-learned models, the small version of Efficientnet v2 with Lion optimizer achieved the best accuracy. Muzzle patterns were demonstrated to have potential as a key for individual cattle identification.
The objective of this study was to identify Hanwoo cattle via a deep-learning model using muzzle images. A total of 9230 images from 336 Hanwoo were used. Images of the same individuals were taken at four different times to avoid overfitted models. Muzzle images were cropped by the YOLO v8-based model trained with 150 images with manual annotation. Data blocks were composed of image and national livestock traceability numbers and were randomly selected and stored as train, validation test data. Transfer learning was performed with the tiny, small and medium versions of Efficientnet v2 models with SGD, RMSProp, Adam and Lion optimizers. The small version using Lion showed the best validation accuracy of 0.981 in 36 epochs within 12 transfer-learned models. The top five models achieved the best validation accuracy and were evaluated with the training data for practical usage. The small version using Adam showed the best test accuracy of 0.970, but the small version using RMSProp showed the lowest repeated error. Results with high accuracy prediction in this study demonstrated the potential of muzzle patterns as an identification key for individual cattle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available