4.7 Review

Opportunities for Regulatory Authorities to Assess Animal-Based Measures at the Slaughterhouse Using Sensor Technology and Artificial Intelligence: A Review

Journal

ANIMALS
Volume 13, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani13193028

Keywords

animal welfare; meat inspection; camera surveillance; sensors; abattoir; machine learning; precision livestock farming; innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal-based measures (ABMs) are the preferred way to assess animal welfare, but manual scoring is time-consuming. Using sensor technology and AI for automatic scoring can provide a solution. This study provides an overview of ABMs recorded at the slaughterhouse for poultry, pigs, and cattle, and examines their applications and relevant legislation. Although there are opportunities to use sensor technology to support meat inspection and improve understanding of animal welfare risks, the lack of external validation for commercially available systems is a concern.
Animal-based measures (ABMs) are the preferred way to assess animal welfare. However, manual scoring of ABMs is very time-consuming during the meat inspection. Automatic scoring by using sensor technology and artificial intelligence (AI) may bring a solution. Based on review papers an overview was made of ABMs recorded at the slaughterhouse for poultry, pigs and cattle and applications of sensor technology to measure the identified ABMs. Also, relevant legislation and work instructions of the Dutch Regulatory Authority (RA) were scanned on applied ABMs. Applications of sensor technology in a research setting, on farm or at the slaughterhouse were reported for 10 of the 37 ABMs identified for poultry, 4 of 32 for cattle and 13 of 41 for pigs. Several applications are related to aspects of meat inspection. However, by European law meat inspection must be performed by an official veterinarian, although there are exceptions for the post mortem inspection of poultry. The examples in this study show that there are opportunities for using sensor technology by the RA to support the inspection and to give more insight into animal welfare risks. The lack of external validation for multiple commercially available systems is a point of attention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available