4.6 Article

Cognitive Workload Classification in Industry 5.0 Applications: Electroencephalography-Based Bi-Directional Gated Network Approach

Journal

ELECTRONICS
Volume 12, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics12194008

Keywords

cognitive workload; Industry 5.0; electroencephalogram; bi-directional gated networks; human-robot interaction; artificial intelligence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the era of Industry 5.0, effectively managing cognitive workload is crucial for optimizing human performance and ensuring operational efficiency. This study proposes an EEG-based Bi-directional Gated Network (BDGN) approach that incorporates LSTM and GRU models for cognitive workload classification in Industry 5.0 applications. The research demonstrates an impressive accuracy of 98% in classifying cognitive workload using the suggested BDGN approach.
In the era of Industry 5.0, effectively managing cognitive workload is crucial for optimizing human performance and ensuring operational efficiency. Using an EEG-based Bi-directional Gated Network (BDGN) approach, this study tries to figure out how to classify cognitive workload in Industry 5.0 applications. The proposed approach incorporates LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) and GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit) models in a hybrid architecture to leverage their complementary strengths. This research highlights the utilization of the developed model alongside the MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) protocol to facilitate real-time end-to-end data transmission. The deployed AI model performs the classification of cognitive workload based on the received data. The main findings of this research reveal an impressive accuracy of 98% in cognitive workload classification, validating the efficacy of the suggested BDGN approach. This study emphasizes the significance of leveraging EEG-based approaches in Industry 5.0 applications for cognitive workload management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available