4.8 Article

Intracellular allosteric antagonism of the CCR9 receptor

Journal

NATURE
Volume 540, Issue 7633, Pages 462-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature20606

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemokines and their G-protein-coupled receptors play a diverse role in immune defence by controlling the migration, activation and survival of immune cells(1). They are also involved in viral entry, tumour growth and metastasis and hence are important drug targets in a wide range of diseases(2,3). Despite very significant efforts by the pharmaceutical industry to develop drugs, with over 50 small-molecule drugs directed at the family entering clinical development, only two compounds have reached the market: maraviroc (CCR5) for HIV infection and plerixafor (CXCR4) for stem-cell mobilization4. The high failure rate may in part be due to limited understanding of the mechanism of action of chemokine antagonists and an inability to optimize compounds in the absence of structural information(5). CC chemokine receptor type 9 (CCR9) activation by CCL25 plays a key role in leukocyte recruitment to the gut and represents a therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel disease(6). The selective CCR9 antagonist vercirnon progressed to phase 3 clinical trials in Crohn's disease but efficacy was limited, with the need for very high doses to block receptor activation(6). Here we report the crystal structure of the CCR9 receptor in complex with vercirnon at 2.8 angstrom resolution. Remarkably, vercirnon binds to the intracellular side of the receptor, exerting allosteric antagonism and preventing G-protein coupling. This binding site explains the need for relatively lipophilic ligands and describes another example of an allosteric site on G-protein-coupled receptors(7) that can be targeted for drug design, not only at CCR9, but potentially extending to other chemokine receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available