4.6 Article

Quantitative Characterization of Shale Pores and Microfractures Based on NMR T2 Analysis: A Case Study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Southeast Sichuan Basin, China

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11102823

Keywords

marine shale; nuclear magnetic resonance T-2 spectrum; pore size distribution; pore type; microfracture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantitatively characterizes the pores and microfractures of marine shale samples from the Longmaxi Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin using NMR T-2 spectra analysis. The results show that organic pores are the dominant type of pores, and NMR porosity includes closed pores and microfractures.
In order to quantitatively characterize shale pores and microfractures, twelve marine shale samples from the Longmaxi Formation in the southeastern Sichuan Basin were selected and their NMR T-2 spectra were analyzed under the conditions of full brine saturation, cyclic centrifugal treatment and cyclic heat treatment. Then, movable, capillary bound and unrecoverable fluid of shale samples were distinguished and the NMR porosity and full-scale PSD were calculated. Based on NMR spectral peak identification, the relative content of pores and microfractures was determined and their influence factors were analyzed. The results show that the PSD of shale samples is bimodal, with pores distributed in the range of 1 nm to 200 nm and microfractures distributed in the range of 200 nm to 5000 nm, with relative contents in the ranges of 3.44-6.79% and 0.22-1.43%, respectively. Nanoscale organic pores are the dominant type of pores, while inorganic pores and microfractures contribute much less to the shale reservoir space than organic pores. The T-2 cutoff values range from 0.55 ms to 6.73 ms, and the surface relaxivities range from 0.0032 mu m/ms to 0.0391 mu m/ms. Their strong correlation with TOC suggests that organic matter is the main factor controlling the pore type and structure. In addition, the main difference between NMR porosity and He porosity is that gas logging porosity is used to detect connected pores, while NMR porosity also includes closed pores and microfractures. Combined with NMR and high-temperature pressure displacement experimental facilities, this will be a further step towards studying the pore structure of shale under simulated formation conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available