4.8 Article

Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification

Journal

NATURE
Volume 536, Issue 7616, Pages 344-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature18958

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Marie Curie individual fellowships
  2. Research Executive Agency [329044, 656306, 326701]
  3. Bettencourt-Schueller foundation
  4. EMBL
  5. European Research Council
  6. VolkswagenStifftung
  7. Joachim Herz foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During pre-implantation development, the mammalian embryo self-organizes into the blastocyst, which consists of an epithelial layer encapsulating the inner-cell mass (ICM) giving rise to all embryonic tissues(1). In mice, oriented cell division, apicobasal polarity and actomyosin contractility are thought to contribute to the formation of the ICM2-5. However, how these processes work together remains unclear. Here we show that asymmetric segregation of the apical domain generates blastomeres with different contractilities, which triggers their sorting into inner and outer positions. Three-dimensional physical modelling of embryo morphogenesis reveals that cells internalize only when differences in surface contractility exceed a predictable threshold. We validate this prediction using biophysical measurements, and successfully redirect cell sorting within the developing blastocyst using maternal myosin (Myh9)-knockout chimaeric embryos. Finally, we find that loss of contractility causes blastomeres to show ICM-like markers, regardless of their position. In particular, contractility controls Yap subcellular localization(6), raising the possibility that mechanosensing occurs during blastocyst lineage specification. We conclude that contractility couples the positioning and fate specification of blastomeres. We propose that this ensures the robust self-organization of blastomeres into the blastocyst, which confers remarkable regulative capacities to mammalian embryos.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available