4.6 Article

Analysis and Modeling of the Onion Peeling Process in the Blowing Compressed Air Method

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11113138

Keywords

onion; peeling; compressed air; peel; waste; non-linear regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the relationship between the efficiency of onion peeling and the amount of waste generated. The results show that the peeling efficiency of the onion and waste of peel mass depend on the compressed air pressure, while the hardness and size of the onion are irrelevant to the process.
This paper presents the relationship between the efficiency of the process of onion peeling and the amount of waste generated in the process. The research was carried out on a pilot test stand for onion peeling. The process variables were the value of the compressed air pressure (p) and the value of the flow opening time through the control valve (t). The experiment took into account the influence of the onion diameter (d0) and its hardness (H). The obtained results were subjected to statistical analysis. Standard deviations were of the percentage loss of onion mass in the form of the peel removed in the onion peeling process in relation to the obtained average values. Tukey's multiple comparison test was performed in order to identify the importance of individual process variables on the final effect of onion peeling. This was the basis for the development of a predictive model in the form of a non-linear regression Mp = f(p,t,d0,H), which is a mathematical description of the onion peeling process. Finally, the response surface area of the relationship between analyzed variables was determined. The results of research show that the peeling efficiency of the onion and waste of peel mass depend on the compressed air pressure. Extending the onion blowing time does not improve the process efficiency, while the hardness and size of the onion are irrelevant to the process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available