4.6 Article

A Methodology for Consolidation Effects of Inventory Management with Serially Dependent Random Demand

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11072008

Keywords

allocation rules; ARMA models; copula method; dedicated facilities; mathematical programming; R software; regular transshipment; statistical methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the effect of time-dependence on inventory consolidation using an autoregressive moving average model. The results show that consolidation can reduce inventory costs under time-dependence, and dedicated locations are beneficial for inventory replenishment. In addition, temporal structures can also lower the costs of maintaining safety stocks.
Most studies of inventory consolidation effects assume time-independent random demand. In this article, we consider time-dependence by incorporating an autoregressive moving average structure to model the demand for products. With this modeling approach, we analyze the effect of consolidation on inventory costs compared to a system without consolidation. We formulate an inventory setting based on continuous-review using allocation rules for regular transshipment and centralization, which establishes temporal structures of demand. Numerical simulations demonstrate that, under time-dependence, the demand conditional variance, based on past data, is less than the marginal variance. This finding favors dedicated locations for inventory replenishment. Additionally, temporal structures reduce the costs of maintaining safety stocks through regular transshipments when such temporal patterns exist. The obtained results are illustrated with an example using real-world data. Our investigation provides information for managing supply chains in the presence of time-patterned demands that can be of interest to decision-makers in the supply chain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available