4.8 Article

Direct measurement of thermal conductivity in solid iron at planetary core conditions

Journal

NATURE
Volume 534, Issue 7605, Pages 99-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature18009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-1039807, EAR-1015239, EAR-1520648, EAR/IF-1128867]
  2. Army Research Office [56122-CH-H]
  3. Carnegie Institution of Washington
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473211]
  5. Chinese Academy of Science [YZ201524]
  6. University of Edinburgh
  7. British Council Researcher Links Programme
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. Division Of Earth Sciences [1520648] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conduction of heat through minerals and melts at extreme pressures and temperatures is of central importance to the evolution and dynamics of planets. In the cooling Earth's core, the thermal conductivity of iron alloys defines the adiabatic heat flux and therefore the thermal and compositional energy available to support the production of Earth's magnetic field via dynamo action(1-3). Attempts to describe thermal transport in Earth's core have been problematic, with predictions of high thermal conductivity(4-7) at odds with traditional geophysical models and direct evidence for a primordial magnetic field in the rock record(8-10). Measurements of core heat transport are needed to resolve this difference. Here we present direct measurements of the thermal conductivity of solid iron at pressure and temperature conditions relevant to the cores of Mercury-sized to Earth-sized planets, using a dynamically laser-heated diamond-anvil cell(11,12). Our measurements place the thermal conductivity of Earth's core near the low end of previous estimates, at 18-44 watts per metre per kelvin. The result is in agreement with palaeomagnetic measurements(10) indicating that Earth's geodynamo has persisted since the beginning of Earth's history, and allows for a solid inner core as old as the dynamo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available