4.8 Article

Broadening not strengthening of the Agulhas Current since the early 1990s

Journal

NATURE
Volume 540, Issue 7634, Pages 570-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature19853

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [OCE-0850891]
  2. Cnes
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1459543] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Western boundary currents-such as the Agulhas Current in the Indian Ocean-carry heat poleward, moderating Earth's climate and fuelling the mid-latitude storm tracks(1,2). They could exacerbate or mitigate warming and extreme weather events in the future, depending on their response to anthropogenic climate change. Climate models show an ongoing poleward expansion and intensification of the global wind systems, most robustly in the Southern Hemisphere(3-5), and linear dynamical theory(6,7) suggests that western boundary currents will intensify and shift poleward as a result(3,8). Observational evidence of such changes comes from accelerated warming and air-sea heat flux rates within all western boundary currents, which are two or three times faster than global mean rates(5,9,10). Here we show that, despite these expectations, the Agulhas Current has not intensified since the early 1990s. Instead, we find that it has broadened as a result of more eddy activity. Recent analyses of other western boundary currents-the Kuroshio and East Australia currents-hint at similar trends(11-15). These results indicate that intensifying winds may be increasing the eddy kinetic energy of boundary currents, rather than their mean flow. This could act to decrease poleward heat transport and increase cross-frontal exchange of nutrients and pollutants between the coastal ocean and the deep ocean. Sustained in situ measurements are needed to properly understand the role of these current systems in a changing climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available