4.6 Article

Metabolomics Profile of the Secretome of Space-Flown Oligodendrocytes

Journal

CELLS
Volume 12, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12182249

Keywords

microgravity; oligodendrocyte progenitors; global metabolomics; oligodendrocyte progenitor energetics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of space microgravity on the metabolomics profile of oligodendrocyte progenitors (OLPs) and reveals increased glutamate and energy metabolism during the OLPs' stay in space. The study also shows significantly increased mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis in OLPs after space flight. These findings provide valuable information about the energetic state of OLPs in space and suggest potential therapeutic targets for long-term space missions.
Intracranial hypertension (ICP) and visual impairment intracranial pressure (VIIP) are some of the sequels of long-term space missions. Here we sought to determine how space microgravity (mu G) impacts the metabolomics profile of oligodendrocyte progenitors (OLPs), the myelin-forming cells in the central nervous system. We report increased glutamate and energy metabolism while the OLPs were in space for 26 days. We also show that after space flight, OLPs (SPC OLPs) display significantly increased mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis. These data are in agreement with our previous work using simulated microgravity. In addition, our global metabolomics approach allowed for the discovery of endogenous metabolites secreted by OLPs while in space that are significantly modulated by microgravity. Our results provide, for the first time, relevant information about the energetic state of OLPs while in space and after space flight. The functional and molecular relevance of these specific pathways are promising targets for therapeutic intervention for humans in long-term space missions to the moon, Mars and beyond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available